Friday Falsehoods #1

You don’t need me to tell you about the upcoming “Ham on Nye” debate – a name with many curious connotations – nor give you my opinion on whether it is a good idea or not. But any aspiring debater needs to be able to almost reflexively parse creationist claims for their most crucial and obvious errors. At present we’re four articles behind, so this is the perfect time to start this series – in future I will probably pull from other, non ICR sources as well.

The format we’ll start off with is to give you a quote from each article to consider, and then (if I can get it to work) you can go to the next page to see what I made of each. Then, head to the comments below to tell me what you would have said.

1. Surprising Human Hand Bone Challenges Evolution, Brian Thomas, 10 January:

A hand bone found in northern Kenya surprised researchers when it surfaced in rock layers assigned a supposed age of about 1.4 million years, making it the oldest dated human bone but still “young” enough to challenge its age assignment. If the secular community is correct in asserting that this discovery outdates the supposed earliest accepted human fossil by almost half a million years, then the find merely illustrates how human anatomy has resisted evolutionary changes for that long.

2. One-Hour Oil Production?, Brian Thomas, 13 January:

Lead researcher Douglas Elliott said in a PNNL news release, “In a sense, we are duplicating the process in the Earth that converted algae into oil over the course of millions of years. We’re just doing it much, much faster.”

How much faster? Let’s do the math: A process that takes one hour in a laboratory is over 26 billion times faster than one that supposedly takes three million years, for example. These lab experiments clearly show oil can form fast. But, what they can’t demonstrate is whether this process can in fact extend over a million years, as uniformitarian scientists contend. Maybe it simply can’t.

3. Mouse Study Shows ‘Junk DNA’ Is Actually Required, Jeffrey Tomkins, 15 January:

It was once believed that the regions in between the protein-coding genes of the genome were wastelands of alleged nonfunctional “junk DNA.” However, we now know that these previously misunderstood regions are teeming with functional activity—and a new study shows they are actually required for life.

4. Amber Flowers Challenge Dinosaur Depictions, Brian Thomas, 17 January:

Dinosaur dioramas don’t display flowers and grasses—supposedly because they had not yet evolved. But it takes only one piece of the right kind of evidence to disprove a whole paradigm. Amazing amber fossils from Burma (now Myanmar) refute the idea that flowers were absent in the supposed Age of Reptiles by showing the abrupt appearance of fully-formed flowers.

Publishing in Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, three scientists described a cluster of small, possibly rose-like flowers encased in amber assigned an age of 100 million years—well within the timeframe that evolutionists ascribe to dinosaurs.

Alright, there should be a next page link around here somewhere…

8 thoughts on “Friday Falsehoods #1

  1. These are all examples that lead me to the principle “never trust what a creationist says.”

    When I saw those reports of an old human bone, I read that as from an earlier species than homo sapiens. Somehow creationists have an uncanny ability to get stuff wrong.

    As a wordpress blogger, I’m a bit curious as to the technicalities of what you did on that “next page” thingy.

  2. Dr Carl Werner has been making a good living of his claim that, because mammals lived alongside the dinosaurs (and they were modern mammals too —- we all know that when an evolutionist says “opossum-like” it was really just an opossum), that the whole idea of evolution is now invalidated.

    Oh, and the scientists have been trying to “conceal” this from the public, because they don’t show these mammal skeletons in museums (note that almost all of the complete Mesozoic mammals are from China, and are in the museums there).

  3. In the kids’ show “Dinosaur Train” they have a pterosaur who loves raising flowers. They go back in time on the Dinosaur Train to earlier eras when there were no flowers.

    So it’s BS. We’ve known for many years that there were flowers in the Cretaceous.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s