2 thoughts on “Modern Plate Tectonics

  1. Plate Tectonics Theory has been found to be illogical to the formation of mountains. The only possible reason for the existence of sea creature fossils on top of mountains should be none other than Great Flood during Noah’s ark.

    The following is the extract from the website, http://www.visionlearning.com/en/library/Earth-Science/6/The-Origin…, pertaining to the origins of plate tectonic theory under the subheading, Ongoing Evidence for Plate Tectonics:

    ‘Today, much of the evidence concerning plate tectonics is acquired with satellite technology. Through use of the global positioning system (GPS) and other satellite-based data collection techniques, scientists can directly measure THE VELOCITY (or speed and direction of movement) OF PLATES on Earth’s surface. SPEEDS RANGE FROM 10 TO 100 MM PER YEAR, confirming the long-held belief that plates move at a slow but constant rate (see our module on Linear Equations for more detail on how to calculate rates of plate movement).
    The Himalayas, as it turns out, started forming about 40 million years ago when the Indian Plate collided head-on with the Eurasian Plate, shoving and folding rocks that had formed below sea level into lofty peaks. Because the Indian Plate is still moving northward, the Himalayas are still rising at a rate of about 1 cm per year. We no longer need to invoke a shrinking, wrinkled Earth to explain the marine fossils at the top of these tall mountains; it is the process of plate tectonics that continues to lift seafloor rocks to the sky.’

    My comment: As mentioned above, the velocity of plate tectonic is at a very slow speed with 10 to 100mm per year. Besides, the phrase, the Himalayas are still rising at a rate of about 1 cm per year, as mentioned above implies scientists support the continuous rising of mountain Himalaya with the speed of 1 cm per year.

    Let’s assume that the mountain Himalayas would be rising from 1 cm per year is true. As the mountain Himalaya would rise from 1 cm per year, the plain land in which living creatures reside would rise 1 cm as well. There is no reason why the plain land would remain the same high despite its nearby mountain could be risen by 1 cm. As the plain land would increase the same high as the same as the nearby mountain, the person that would stand at the mountain to measure its high would find no discrepancy even million years later. Thus, there is no reason why scientists would presume the continuous increase in high of mountain except the rising of sea level due to the simultaneous increase in high for both the mountain Himalaya as well as the plain land nearby. Indeed, the sea level all the while remains about the same high has proven the assumption of the continuous increase of mountain to be erroneous.

    The following are the extracts from website, http://library.thinkquest.org/10131/geology.html:

    ‘Soon afterwards, about 65 million years ago (Upper Eocene Period), came the second phase of mountain building. The bed of the Tethys started rising again. The sea retreated, and the sea bed was elevated into high mountain ranges.
    Later, about 25 million years ago (Middle Miocene Period) came another mountain building period which led to the formation of the low Shivalik ranges. After this, periodic mountain building phases occurred as the Indian plate pushed against the Eurasian plates which led to the Himalayan ranges rising further. The last major phase occurred 600,000 years ago.’

    My comment: As the speed of plate tectonic is at 10 to 200 mm per year as mentioned earlier, how could this slow speed have great impact upon lands to cause sea bed to be elevated into high mountain ranges? Unless the speed would be fast, the impact upon the land would be weak to cause seabed to be elevated. With such a slow speed to act upon seabed, it would be impossible for plate tectonic theory to be workable upon it to cause it to form mountains.

    Even if one would assume that the speed of plate tectonic upon the seabed would be fast so as to cause the rise of mountain, it might cause the concrete that is underneath the seabed to crack and turns up to have two layers of seabed and one is the upper seabed and another is the one that is underneath. The continuous exerting of pressure to cause the upper seabed to rise would result the hollow that is underneath to be formed after the crack to become broader to the ultimate collapse of the upper seabed. Thus, it seems to be that the formation of mountain through plate tectonic might seem to be unrealistic.

    As the plate tectonic theory seems to be illogical to be used to support the existence of seashells that were found on top of mountains, the only reason that we would rely upon is the existence of Noah’s ark that would have caused sea creature fossils to be deposited on mountains.

  2. Strong evidence of the presence of Noah’s ark in the past.

    Refer to the website, https://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwart/hist257s02/students/Anna…. Many theories were established in the past pertaining to the formation of mountains and they were The conflagration Theory, Halley’s Theory and The Geologic Theory.

    However, all these theories fail to explain the discovery of many seashells on the top of mountains since how they could reach up to the top of mountains unless the presence of sea waves that would have caused the seashells to be pushed up from the seabed to the top of mountains. The mountains are a few thousands meters above the ground. In order for seawater to be increased and to be raised up to the top of the mountain, the sea level has to be increased. As the sea level increased, the whole wide world would be in the water since all the plain lands of this earth in which inhabitants dwell are very much lower than the top of the mountains. Even if the sea level would reach 1/5 of the high of the mountains, the entire earth would be in the flood since none of the plain lands of this earth would have such a high. Even though there might be floods in the past, it was mainly caused by rains instead of from the rise of sea level. There is no way for rains to bring forth sea creatures but from seas. The mountains are most of the time located more than a few hundreds or thousands miles far away from the sea. As mountains are very far away from the sea, it is impossible for any crisis of Tsunami that would bring forth from the sea to reach out to the high of mountains. There is no way for sea creatures to be deposited in the mountains unless the sea water would rise. If the sea water would rise above the plain lands in which inhabitants dwell, many of them could not survive and not even the survivals of edible plants, such as, carrots, tomatoes and etc., or even living animals. Even if they would survive, they would have to live on boats and could not grow edible plants, such as, tomatoes, carrots and etc., for their consumption.

    There is no reason to assume that seashells could climb their way up to the top mountains so as to have their rest there.

    The existence of seashells on top of mountains is a strong evidence to prove the presence of Great Flood in Genesis 6-7. It was with this Great Flood that covered the entire earth that was accompanied with great sea waves as a result of continuous rain that would have caused the seashells to be pushed up on top of mountains.

    The following are the websites to prove the discovery of sea creature fossils in the mountains especially the undeniable truth, the presence of seashells on top of mountains:
    https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=edible%20vegetables&bav=on.2
    https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=edible%20vegetables&bav=on.2

Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s