Don’t expect anything too soon – I have a set of exams coming up which I really ought to be studying for. It’s not a very long book though, so it shouldn’t be too onerous.
Eye on the ICR
Refuting the Institute for Creation Research since 2011
Eye on the ICR 
“It’s not a very long book though, so it shouldn’t be too onerous”
I have a feeling that’s going to be a failed prediction, you non-psychic you
It’s not actually all that bad, reading wise. The problem is the urge to chuck the book to the other end of the room, exclaiming ‘bullshit!’
You need to get some “citation needed” stickers.
More interesting than the parts he doesn’t cite, I’m finding, are the places where he switches from the normal literature to his own work, generally without saying so. That and the things he doesn’t mention at all. “Authoritative” indeed…
Aren’t you the lucky one.
A much more fulfilling read would be Jeremy Taylor’s “Not a Chimp” (blog here: http://notachimp.blogspot.com.au/ ) which is a fully evolutionary argument why the two species aren’t so close together.
I’ll look that over, thanks – it should be useful to determine what’s a real difference and what’s not.