The ultimate question: How soon can we get bingo by applying the Creationist Argument Bingo table to the ICR?
Click through to help edit
Obviously, a line will be easy, so we’re aiming for the whole thing.
This may be a bit more difficult, considering that ICR is (probably) above things like “EVILution” (but that doesn’t mean I can’t co-opt the term regardless). Still, I wouldn’t be surpriesd.
If you want to help, click the picture and do so! Click the words you want to edit, and change their textbox’s fill to red. Then, put a new textbox below that and paste in your source URL. Alternatively, post your contribution below.
Posted by The ICR’s Acts and ‘Facts’ – August « Eye on the ICR on 02/08/2011 at 9:42 pm
[...] BINGO! [...]
Posted by The ICR’s Acts and ‘Facts’ – September « Eye on the ICR on 01/09/2011 at 8:28 pm
[...] BINGO! [...]
Posted by Bruce Haire on 12/11/2011 at 2:16 pm
Nice Blog!
Posted by carney on 12/12/2011 at 2:37 pm
Trouble getting the bingo page to load, so Re: “Marxism was based on Darwinism.” Social Darwism was both a movement and an oxymoron. Darwin wrote that “there is no fundemental distinction between varieties and species.”
Check out The Evolution of Racism, by Pat Shipman. Much about the 19th century mind is clarified.
Blog is well done.
Posted by eyeonicr on 13/12/2011 at 8:59 pm
The real question is not the validity of the arguments but how long until they get around to them all.
I’ll add that to my metal list of books I need to read as soon as I have time.
Posted by JavaDavis on 20/12/2011 at 4:40 pm
found the ICR site, then 2 clicks to find “Show us the transitional forms” at http://www.icr.org/fossils-stasis/. Am I missing something, or does that fill out center/top square?
Posted by eyeonicr on 20/12/2011 at 5:05 pm
Yeah, that counts – I need to update this a little more.
Posted by JavaDavis on 21/12/2011 at 8:37 am
What fun!
Here’s a candidate for “Fossils laid down in the great flood” in the bottom row. http://www.icr.org/article/6533/
Posted by JavaDavis on 21/12/2011 at 8:42 am
This might be the “Microevolution, Yes; macroevolution, no” – at least they use both of those words within first 5 paragraphs.
http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/
Posted by JavaDavis on 21/12/2011 at 8:46 am
Here is “HITLER beleived in Evolution!” – and do they get any extra points for, let’s call it, “Einstein sided with the church on this one”?
http://www.icr.org/article/hitlers-evolution-versus-christian-resistance/
Posted by eyeonicr on 21/12/2011 at 8:13 pm
That’s interesting – I didn’t expect to be able to fill in that one…
But then again they do seem to have mellowed in the last fifteen years or so.
Posted by JavaDavis on 23/12/2011 at 10:20 am
Thanks for filling those in, too – my ‘browser does not support’ me editing your bingo board.